« Back to 911FireExtinguishers.com

Nobody needs convincing of the massive damage that fire can cause, but sometimes a fire can be so overwhelming that it changes the course of history.
Here are 6 fires that changed the world.
2-5 September 1666


Some historians even claim the Great Fire of London may have saved lives in the long-term, as it halted the spread of the bubonic plague, which erupted the previous year. The fire would have burnt down many filthy building that housed the rats and fleas that spread the plague.
The fire was widely regarded as a catholic plot; the fallout from the fire was one of the reasons behind the glorious revolution of the next century and the end of the catholic kings of England.
18-22 April 1906
The 1906 San Francisco earthquake is one of America's most destructive natural disasters ever suffered. It was the subsequent fire, not the earthquake itself, that caused most of the damage.


Another effect of the fire's destruction was that thousands of immigrants were able to claim residency and citizenship since City Hall and the Hall of Records were destroyed. Families of immigrants were also able to come to San Francisco, changing the make-up of the population forever, resulting in the super diverse city we know today.
14 May 1940
Germany had long considered capturing the Netherlands a crucial part of its war campaign, not least because the country lay in the way of Great Britain. It was largely thanks to a fire that ravaged the city leaving 85,000 people homeless and thousands of buildings razed that the Dutch were forced to surrender to the Nazis.
The fires started as a result of German air raids (their famous blitzkrieg tactic), which focused on residential areas. The fires that erupted from the combination of hi-explosive and incendiary bombs couldn't be contained and became worse as winds became stronger.
Eventually the city was at the mercy of a firestorm.

The devastation in Rotterdam caused by fire undoubtedly convinced the Dutch to immediately surrender. If they had resisted futher, another Dutch city would undoubtedly have crumbled under Nazi flames.
With the Germans free to take control of the Netherlands, almost 140,000 Dutch Jews were put at risk of dying in Nazi concentration camps – the most famous, Anne Frank, was captured in Amsterdam in 1944.

It's impossible to say how the course of the war might have changed if Rotterdam hadn't been engulfed in flames. We do know, however, that the wreckage caused by the bombing and subsequent fires led the British to change their bombing policy – they would now bomb industrial buildings that aided the German war effort as well as military targets.
It was this policy that was behind the fire bombing of Dresden and, later in the war, the atomic bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

The fire started in a barn in the south-west of the city but quickly spread into the centre because of strong winds. Conditions conspired against the capital of Illinois to create a conflagration that consumed all but five public buildings within the disaster zone.
Wood was an overused building material in the city, but there had also been a drought making this wood drier, and the city's fire department were exhausted from tackling a major fire the day before.

19 and 28 July 1588
When the Spanish Armada set sail for England they must have believed they had a fleet with the power to dethrone Elizabeth I. However, once a ship was sighted off the coast of Cornwall on 19 July a trail of fire beacons were lit allowing a message to quickly reach London, alerting Elizabeth of the approaching threat. This gave the English the time they needed to launch a fleet of their own.

Fire played another important role during the battle. The English fleet sacrificed eight of its ships on 28 July, setting them alight and pushing them towards the closely grouped Spanish vessels. Although these fireships did not burn any of the enemy Spanish ships, it caused a break in their tight defensive formation, which would ultimately prove decisive.

Had the Spanish Armada been successful in its aim the course of English history, and therefore world history, would have been remarkably different. For starters, we wouldn't talk of an Elizabethan Era – we'd probably know it as la era de Felipe.
14-18 September 1812
The unsuccessful French invasion of Russia proved to be a decisive turning point in European politics, as it led to Napoleon eventually abdicating and the First French Empire collapsing.
The failure of the invasion was largely caused by the Fire of Moscow, which happened on the very day the French marched into the spiritual capital of Russia. Three quarters of the city had been razed by the time the fire was finally extinguished.

The buildings that had burnt down – food stores and shelters among them – were vital to the French. Without them, Napoleon and his army were forced to retreat. Historians have debated the causes of the fire. Many believe the Russians started it intentionally before fleeing the city, while others suggest the carelessness of French soldiers started the blaze.

While the cause of the fire may be disputed, the significance of its consequences cannot. Had France been successful Napoleon would not have abdicated several years later and French supremacy in Europe would have stretched deep into the 19th century.
Man's relationship with fire has always been a complex and dangerous one. Without fire we'd still be at the level of beasts, but she is a harsh mistress, even the greatest of us can suffer her wrath.
